![]() ![]() Methods: A prospective 5-year service evaluation delivered between 20. Our secondary aim was to evaluate airway management practice, technique and outcomes during the pandemic with routine practice outside of pandemic periods. ![]() Our main aims were to evaluate first pass success and complication rates over time in the context of iterative quality improvement measures and report parallel changes in practice over the same period. Objectives: We sought to evaluate all emergency airway interventions conducted outside a controlled theatre environment at a single major trauma and neurosciences centre in North West England over a 5 year period. 5 It is also unclear as to how these interventions have been embedded into airway management outside the operating room and whether they offer cumulative marginal gains in safety. 4 The incorporation of some of these initiatives into routine or ‘habitual’ care remains controversial. 1-3 Several initiatives to improve safety (such as video laryngoscopy, checklists, simulation training etc.) have been studied in isolation and are now recommended in national guidance. Introduction: Emergency airway management outside a controlled theatre environment is associated with a high rate of adverse events. Trends in emergency airway management outside the operating room at a UK major trauma centre a five-year iterative quality improvement projectĭaniel Horner 1, Christopher Ambrose 2, Christopher Taylor 2, Lola Erinle 2ġ Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |